DOWNLOAD
BJPC Form - (English)BJPC Form - (Burmese)
Referendum Survey in 2008
----------------------------
KNG mini drugs report
BNI Latest News
- Junta spurns Wa proposal
- Environmentalists mark anti-dam day
- Burmese military intelligence office gutted in Arakan
- Burmese PM to visit northern Arakan
- Democratic Party gearing up to be in election fray
- Chin politicians gear up for 2010 elections in Burma
- Kachin Party to contest 2010 polls
- Nasaka calls villagers to clarify electoral laws
- NLD CC meeting to decide on future of party
- Mizos set Guinness World Record for Bamboo (Cheraw) dance
Most Read in 7 days
- Thailand’s political unrest cuts down timber exports, traders in Three Pagodas Pass claim
- BUILDING AN EDUCATION: NGO WORKS WITH CHILDREN OF MIGRANT CONSTRUCTION WORKERS
- Burma's electoral laws undemocratic: Indian experts
- Junta reinforces troops in ceasefire regions
- Motorcycles to be back on Rangoon roads
- Election analysis barred in Burmese publications
- Amid growing unemployment rates, Burmese women turn to prostitution to survive
- KIO delegates meet junta brass for the twelfth time on BGF
- Children die of starvation in Bangladesh refugee camps
- Nasaka steps up harassment in Maungdaw
ListServ Subscription
| Malaysian justice minister reverses book ban | | Print | |
| Media Alert - Media Alert | |||
| Report by CIJ | |||
| Tuesday, 26 January 2010 11:00 | |||
|
 The following statement is issued by the Centre for Independent Journalism (CIJ), a SEAPA partner based in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: CIJ welcomes court decision to overturn book ban The Centre for Independent Journalism (CIJ) welcomes a court decision to quash a ban on a book published by Sisters in Islam (SIS). The ruling has set an important precedent that limits the previously unchecked power of the Minister of Home Affairs under the Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984 (PPPA). On 25 January, Justice Mohamad Ariff Md Yusof ruled that the state's restriction of fundamental liberties must take into account the proportionality of the restriction. In this case, where less than five percent of the text was being disputed, he argued that the ban was disproportionate. He also agreed with SIS's concern for procedural propriety, as the government did not inform SIS about the ban. Instead, the organisation learned about the ban through the media, and later confirmed it with the ministry. The ministry had argued that the book, entitled, "Muslim Women and the Challenge of Islamic Extremism", was prejudicial to public order, even though the book had been in circulation for two years before the ban. The judge ruled against this argument. Though CIJ is pleased that the ruling defines a boundary around the absolute power sanctioned under the PPPA, the law itself is still an effective instrument to curb the free flow of expression and information. The burden is still on the affected individual/s to challenge the ministry, and the sheer effort could be discouraging. The ruling in favour of SIS came only after 18 months of marshaling institutional support and resources. CIJ calls for the repeal of the PPPA as the first step in upholding Article 10 of the Federal Constitution, which guarantees the right to freedom of speech.
|
